Sunday, November 21, 2021

There Would Be a Time for Mourning

 The following is from the book: Helmet for My Pillow: from Parris Island to the Pacific, Robert Leckie.

It is not always or immediately saddening to hear “who got it.” Except for one’s close buddies, it is difficult to feel deep, wracking grief for the dead, and now, hearing the lieutenant tolling off the names, I had to force my face into a mask of mourning, deliberately adorn my heart with black, as it were, for I was shocked to gaze inward and see no sorrow there. Rather than permit myself to know myself a monster (as I seemed, then) I deliberately deluded myself by feigning bereavement. So did we all.

About 20 years after Robert's experience, I, upon the combat loss of comrades, thought myself to be psychologically defective when I felt much the same following combat losses over the longest five years. Others, with whom I spoke about this feeling agreed that they, in wonder, felt the same. When the task was mine to write condolence letters I felt, guiltily, that I was just making up the proper words and phrases. I didn't really feel them. I consoled myself with the thought that there would be a time for morning. And I have now lived long enough to realize that truth. I don't remember most of their names, but I see them and their deaths or ghastly wounds vividly many-a-night in nightmares. I don't dream about successes or victories, but the events that resulted in horror.

Sunday, June 27, 2021

Philosophy--The Hard Questions

 What came or was before the big bang? Why is there something rather than nothing? Does the universe exist only because we are conscious of it? 

Consciousness

A number of past and current philosophers contend that consciousness is what always was and will be, the "before" the universe. In other words, consciousness is God. If we define "nothing" as lacking space, time, and material, then it seems that consciousness could well be the "nothing" that came before. Yet so could many other brain-evoked universal non-material nouns such as love, fear, apprehension, intelligence, etc.

"I propose that consciousness can be defined as a particular state of awareness, characterised by a curious recursiveness in which individuals are not only aware, but aware that they are aware." - David P Barash, https://aeon.co/essays/the-self-conscious-animal-how-human-minds-evolved; 2013

 To be aware that we are aware can be painful. Would it not be more comfortable to feel bad without knowing that we feel bad? Actually, could we even feel bad if we were not aware of feeling bad? Can the two be separated--1) feeling bad and 2) being aware of feeling bad? If consciousness is a product of evolution, then it would have arisen and grown as a result of proving itself to be better than worse for humans. Natural selection without consciousness would give precedence to the more immediate than to longer term, thus, in the longer term be detrimental. Satisfying hunger by the excessive consumption of fatty, sugary foods results in short-term pleasure but eventual bodily distress. Consciousness could well have grown from necessity. And socially, if we were unaware of our effects on others, we would be quite boorish.

If not evolutionary, then it is inherent to the material brain and/or ethereal thought. 

The argument for a God of a type

In The Life of the Cosmos (1999), the physicist Lee Smolin has estimated that, taking into account all of the fine-tuning examples considered, the chance of life existing in the Universe is 1 in 10229, from which he concludes:

In my opinion, a probability this tiny is not something we can let go unexplained. Luck will certainly not do here; we need some rational explanation of how something this unlikely turned out to be the case.

In my opinion, there could be another possibility. Could it be that if the fine-tuning of the strong nuclear force, chemical complexity, and gravity had been different by enough to not allow life as we know it, a life different than we know, yet life, would instead have evolved?

The evidence for a biblical God or a multiverse is incomplete and what there is, is arguable.

Tononi’s theory that both differentiation and integration are required for consciousness is known as integrated information theory (IIT).

https://aeon.co/essays/to-say-what-consciousness-is-science-explores-where-it-isnt

"First, each conscious experience is specific. Your experience of the colour blue is what it is, in part, because blue is not yellow. If you had never seen any colour other than blue, you would most likely have no concept or experience of colour. Likewise, if all food tasted exactly the same, taste experiences would have no meaning, and vanish. This requirement that each conscious experience must be specific is known as differentiation.

"But, at the same time, consciousness is integrated. This means that, although objects in consciousness have different qualities, we never experience each quality separately. When you see a basketball whiz towards you, its colour, shape and motion are bound together into a coherent whole. During a game, you’re never aware of the ball’s orange colour independently of its round shape or its fast motion. By the same token, you don’t have separate experiences of your right and your left visual fields – they are interdependent as a whole visual scene.

"Tononi identified differentiation and integration as two essential features of consciousness. And so, just as the essential features of life might lead a scientist to infer the existence of DNA, the essential features of consciousness led Tononi to infer the physical properties of a conscious system."

What is Time? Time is imaginary, implied from awareness of motion and change. Without such awareness we would lack consciousness. Tensed time would not exist. We would be aware only the present.

Friday, June 25, 2021

F15s and Nucs

 Biden's intelligence is not questioned. We know he isn't. But at least he could appear to be not silly. Threatening the American people with F15s and nuclear weapons is just plain silly but not surprising. Biden as with most of our civilian government leaders have very short memories and lack an understanding of guerilla warfare. The French military was soundly beaten as was the United States military in Vietnam. And the wars in the middle east are little different. We were not and are not being beaten by supersonic airplanes or nuclear weapons; no, rather by homemade booby traps and explosives and small arms. Just imagine how difficult it would be to quell thousands of small determined uprisings throughout the country. The massing of modern firepower would result in unacceptable collateral damage. I fought in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand and am very aware of how impossible it is to distinguish friend from enemy. And how many members of our military would rather fight for American values and the Flag of the United States than for progressive communism? Mr. Biden, your threats are meaningless and just plain silly.

Thursday, April 29, 2021

Areas of Most Concern

 We are experiencing a multitude of aggressive moves toward socialism, even communism, in all our institutions. There are two that are most concerning to me as they tend to affect all the others: Marxist influence in education and social media's control of speech.

Thursday, March 4, 2021

Philophosy and War

 

People assume that it’s the bad experiences soldiers have endured that make it difficult to adjust to life after the military. While this is sometimes true, very often it’s the absence of what soldiers valued that makes the transition difficult – the loss of meaning, sense of purpose and belonging. Those who sign up for service are likely more hard-wired than most to seek these things, making the loss all the keener.

Reading John Gray in War, Andy Owen in Aeon, 2021

War is horrible and exciting. Usually exciting to the young male of our species, even to the older male who hasn't yet grown up or maybe hasn't yet experienced the burn of shapnel or bullet in himself or a comrade. Even then we (the male) might tend to imagine ourselves, excitingly, heroes of an firefight or parachuting into battle.

Tuesday, February 16, 2021

The DNA of Democracy

Quotes from the book The DNA of Democracy, Richard C. Lyons, June 11, 2019 

 ...democracy itself need not end with enormous explosions; it may be smothered in gathering silences. Democcracy need not be killed in overt acts of war; it may perish through what appears to be kindness. Democracy need not fall visibly, noisily and dramatically; it may crumble, by imperceptible degrees befoe disappearig. Democracy eed not be crushed by foreign foes; it may collapse under many slight asssaults, given and received by its own citizens, whose acts serve and end of societal implosion.

On kinds of government:

The kinds of government, whether tyrannical or democratic, have key, core characteristics that serve as and ideational code, much like biological DNA. This code determines the structural characteristics and resultant behavior of a government. DNA is the essential information code out of which the distinct circumstancrs of the flesh of governance gathers.

In the beginning:

The history of democracy...begins with early 'laor pains' that intensify with opposition to tyranny.

Simple tyranny:

...exemplified by the Egypt of the all-powerful Pharaoh. It is the simple tyranny: rule by the one, through the few, to enslave the multitudes. 

In the first chapters, Lyons makes the distinction between the Pharaohic inhumane human-god tyrannical government and the Israelite's divine God coupled with the rule of law, God's law. However,

During the period of the Kings, Israel again faced the critical question of idolatry when their own kings demanded to be considered “God’s Anointed” in the person of a human king—to be regarded in a position of omnipotence, above the temple as well as the people. Israel was soon divided by the question. In the weakness of this division, the people were again conquered and made captive… this time to Babylon, where in exile Israel’s law was further strengthened, until the people realized God was not confined to an area or to a city;,,,,

Types of governments in early Greece:

There were notable tyrannies in Samos, Corinth and Thessaly; monarchies in Sparta and Epirus; oligarchies in Megara and Thebes, democracies in Argos and Rhodes. But the foremost city-state remembered and revered today, the one where democracy was wrought and the one from which our democratic DNA derives, was that of Athens, whose democracy—as has so commonly occurred—was birthed out of tyranny.

Athens:

After a fierce battle, Isagoras and the Spartans, who had never known surrender until that moment, were removed from the Acropolis and the people of Athens assumed its government. Cleisthenes was chosen to write a new constitution for the city-state. And, for the first time in Western civilization’s recorded history, in place of one person controlling the multitudes through a few ministers, the power of government was constitutionally placed with the people. The free, citizen, male population, that is: many centuries would pass before women and slaves were recognized as citizens. No longer would one person control all the gifts of the gods, all the lands and commerce of the state, all the public monies and ministries, all the spies and soldiers a tyrant could field. The government would consist of—would be conducted and controlled by—the people.

Darias the Great 's spies akin to today's tech giants:

His rule was reinforced by a system of spies dubbed "the king's ears and eyes."

In 490 BCE, a Persian flotilla of 600 ships and some 125,000 men embarked on an invasion to strangle and crush democracy in its cradle.

When Athens was faced with annihilation and slavery from Darias' son Xeres, Athenian political opponents come together: 

Among the returning exiles was Aristides, who had a longtime personal and political feud with his rival, Themistocles. Reflecting the selfless actions of their people, the men swallowed their discontents and met, with Aristides saying: “Themistocles, let us lay aside at this time our vain and childish contentions; let us enter upon a safe and honorable dispute, vying with each other for the preservation of Greece. At other times, but especially now, it is right for us to stand opposed as to which of us will do our city of Athens more good!” Themistocles, who rarely had agreed with Aristides in anything, agreed with him in this, and they united together with their fellow citizens to face the Persians.

 Socrates:

Free society allows anyone to follow a philosopher’s first task: the study of the soul without any governmental or societal constraints and in sympathy with the dictates of one’s own individual nature.” Socrates

Honoring the military:

“We inspire wonder now, for we have forced every sea and every land to give access to our daring! Fix your gaze daily on the power that actually belongs to the city and become her erastai [citizen heroes]! And when you realize her greatness, keep in mind that those who acquired this were men of daring, men who knew what was demanded, men who were ashamed to be found wanting in action…They gave their lives in common; and each on his own received in return both a praise that never grows old and the most remarkable of tombs… not that in which they lie buried, but rather that in which their reputation is laid up forever, always to be remembered on every occasion which calls for speech or deed.” Pericles

 Rome, from democracy to tyranny (does this sound familiar; United States, November-January 2020, National Guard in the capital, tech giants erasing conservatives, Democrats packing the Supreme Court, corporations terminating conservatives, woke culture canceling everything American):

Tarquinius then unleashed and deftly deployed the usual arts of tyranny upon the people, beginning with spying on the citizenry and purging those senators and their families who favored, or were merely suspected of favoring, the legitimacy of Tullius. He then raised about him the bodyguard his forebear Numa had disbanded generations earlier. He took over the judiciary arm of government and decided to try all capital cases himself, thereby appropriating the power to inflict death, poverty or exile on any citizen, his family or friends, even the very least associate of his opponents.

On the other hand, Biden fully supports his son's anti-American activities:

But his sons bowed their heads. His sons stood silent. The whole of the gathered assembly could view on his face the father’s anguish. But what would the laws be if he, for his own personal reasons, were to subvert them? Brutus condemned his own sons. He turned to the lictors (those who carried out capital sentences) and said, “What remains is your duty.” His sons were scourged and beheaded before his eyes. And it proved that the one who endured the harshest, most unendurable sentence of the law that day was Brutus himself, for not putting his own family above the law. Brutus had to witness his sons’ execution that the law might survive.

After Athens and Rome:

These persons, constitutions and events had to live through memory, for after the fall of the Roman Republic (save for its own descendants, a millennium later, in Italy’s similarly organized city-states) no comparable democracies or republics existed anywhere on Earth for one thousand, eight hundred years.

Work in progress. 

Saturday, February 13, 2021

My Biggest Fear

 What scares me the most about what is happening in the United States and other previously free democracies is the acceptance by so many of the illogic of the denial of free speech and the rapid movement toward the denial of free thought, without which a population cannot be free. It is understandable why the power-hungry need it so, however, how could so many private citizens accept, even support, such a tyranny of ideas?

Dan Crenshaw on Conservatism

 The Conservative Guide to the Culture Wars (in no particular order):

1. America is worthy of our love and patriotism. 

2. Victor mentality is better than a victim mentality. 

3. Free speech is absolute. “Hate speech” is not an objective term.

4. It doesn’t matter what kind of gun you restrict, criminals still hurt people. Let us protect ourselves.

5. You get to keep wealth you create & pass it to your kids.

6. The govt has no right to shut down your business or invade your home without due process, even in pandemics

7. Women should not have to compete against men in women’s sports. 

8. Verifying ID to vote is not racist. It is common sense.

9. Borders and national sovereignty are not racist or xenophobic.

10. You can’t have freedom without order, order without law, law without morality, morality without religion, or religion without God.

11. Innocent until proven guilty - not the other way around.

12. Personal responsibility is a virtue.

13. Never give into cancel culture (but stay humble and apologize when you’re wrong).

14. The founding was 1776, not 1619.

15. Stand for the anthem.

16. Policy that favors one race over another is not “social justice,” it is racist.

17. It’s Latinos, not Latinx.

18. Less abortion, more adoption.

19. Only women can be pregnant and breastfeed.

20. It’s ok to lose in competitive sports, and second place trophies don’t help anyone (but also see # 7).

21. More police, not defund the police.

22. We don’t tear up the past, we learn from it.

23. This list is not exhaustive.



Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/02/dan_crenshaw_has_created_a_handydandy_list_of_conservative_principles.html#ixzz6mMC7hncK
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook