Friday, July 31, 2015

The Common Core and How to Teach

From the Illinois Board of Education websiteThe Common Core determines what educators should teach, not how they should teach. Teachers will continue to have the freedom to tailor lesson plans to the individual needs of their students. And from the Common Core Standards for Mathematics: These Standards do not dictate curriculum or teaching methods. (The example given is a permission to reorder topics!)

As we know, this is the mantra around which the non-educator-written Common Core was sold pushed. Most experienced educators know after a cursory review of but a few standards that this is the result of either a complete misunderstanding of pedagogy or a deliberate lie.

How is this not how?

Operations and Algebraic Thinking 1.OA


Represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction.
1. Use addition and subtraction within 20 to solve word problems involving situations of adding to, taking from, putting together, taking apart, and comparing, with unknowns in all positions, e.g., by using objects, drawings, and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem.2


2. Solve word problems that call for addition of three whole numbers whose sum is less than or equal to 20, e.g., by using objects, drawings, and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem.


Understand and apply properties of operations and the relationship between addition and subtraction.
3. Apply properties of operations as strategies to add and subtract.3 Examples: If 8 + 3 = 11 is known, then 3 + 8 = 11 is also known. (Commutative property of addition.) To add 2 + 6 + 4, the second two numbers can be added to make a ten, so 2 + 6 + 4 = 2 + 10 = 12. (Associative property of addition.)


4. Understand subtraction as an unknown-addend problem. For example, subtract 10 – 8 by finding the number that makes 10 when added to 8.


Add and subtract within 20.
5. Relate counting to addition and subtraction (e.g., by counting on 2 to add 2).


6. Add and subtract within 20, demonstrating fluency for addition and subtraction within 10. Use strategies such as counting on; making ten (e.g., 8 + 6 = 8 + 2 + 4 = 10 + 4 = 14); decomposing a number leading to a ten (e.g., 13 – 4 = 13 – 3 – 1 = 10 – 1 = 9); using the relationship between addition and subtraction (e.g., knowing that 8 + 4 = 12, one knows 12 – 8 = 4); and creating equivalent but easier or known sums (e.g., adding 6 + 7 by creating the known equivalent 6 + 6 + 1 = 12 + 1 = 13).


Work with addition and subtraction equations.
7. Understand the meaning of the equal sign, and determine if equations involving addition and subtraction are true or false. For example, which of the following equations are true and which are false? 6 = 6, 7 = 8 – 1, 5 + 2 = 2 + 5, 4 + 1 = 5 + 2.


8. Determine the unknown whole number in an addition or subtraction equation relating three whole numbers. For example, determine the unknown number that makes the equation true in each of the equations 8 + ? = 11, 5 = � – 3, 6 + 6 = �.


How about this instead?
SLO: TASK: Add and subtract within 20; STANDARD: 100% accuracy; special needs TBD teacher.
SLO: TASK: Understand the meaning of the equal, plus and minus signs. STANDARD: 100%; special needs TBD teacher.


Monday, July 27, 2015

Coding for Educators and Students

I am not sold on the idea that in and of itself coding is a K-12 essential. There are now a number of databases containing common code sequences in all languages and it won't be too far in the future when code will be available "on demand" by way of plain language query not unlike Google. A little further out, five or fewer years, I expect we will see code that writes code. Consequently, I don't have much faith in estimates claiming that 1.4 million programming jobs will be needed over the next decade.

However, from my limited experience with it, I do believe coding to be a beneficial technological integration tool. Coding is "non-subject specific, lending itself to interdisciplinary lessons that integrate math, science, English, art and a variety of other subjects. Students simultaneously balance logical reasoning, creativity and problem solving in real-world scenarios." Watch the video at Made with Code. Then, if you're not convinced that coding requires a considerable amount of logical reasoning, creativity and problem-solvingtry a couple of simple projects of your own. At the least you will gain an appreciation for what is involved in programming. EmergingEdTech lists and briefly discusses four additional coding sites for teachers and students. If you really want a challenge sign up for Harvard's very well known free introductory computer science course, CS50.

Microsoft Edge

Microsoft Edge, scheduled to replace Internet Explorer, is touted to make browsing simpler and will be available soon (possibly as early as this Wednesday if you have reserved the Windows 10 update). Personally I am and have been a Chrome user for a long time, in part because it 'seems' faster and because it is integrated with many other Google products. But I definitely plan to try out Microsoft's new browser.

Here is a PC World non-critical "how-to" and review of the a number of Edge features. Of interest are Cortana (highlight a particular word or phrase and upon right-click, Cortana will summon a sidebar that will provide definition and help), Reading View (strips out all the extraneous ads, navigation bars, everything), Reading List (essentially a temporary bookmark of a story you want to read, but not keep forever), and Web Notes (takes a snapshot of the static page, then drops down a header with shortcuts to a digital pen, highlighter, and eraser),

Sunday, July 26, 2015

Terminator: Gynesis

2015-07-26_1352

Chart and verbiage from The Emerging Future.

"Eighteen to twenty years out, technological advancements will be hundreds of thousands to a million times more advanced. That makes our first 14 years of exponential growth seem flat-lined (no progress), when, in fact, it will be 4,000 times more advanced than today. We currently have regenerative medicine in clinical trials and consumer wireless computer-brain interfaces for $300. What will it be like in 20 years when technology is a million times better?"

Many serious and respected scientist and futurists predict that continuing technological advancements at the current rate will result in a technological singularity.

"The technological singularity is the hypothetical advent of artificial general intelligence (also known as "strong AI"). Such a computer, computer network, or robot would theoretically be capable of recursive self-improvement (redesigning itself), or of designing and building computers or robots better than itself. Repetitions of this cycle would likely result in a runaway effect — an intelligence explosion[1][2] — where smart machines design successive generations of increasingly powerful machines, creating intelligence far exceeding human intellectual capacity and control. Because the capabilities of such a superintelligence may be impossible for a humans to comprehend, the technological singularity is an occurrence beyond which events may become unpredictable, unfavorable, or even unfathomable."

Scary and as of now at least, hypothetical and movie fodder, however, let's look out a mere five years:

2015-07-26_1420

What will be the impact on education? Technologies have already been created to give us the ability to:

  • Regenerate our sick and aging bodies giving us healthy radical longevity

  • Personal guidance

  • Free energy

  • Desktop fabricators

  • An interactive intelligent environment

  • Accident free autonomous transportation

  • Embedded nano and micro intelligent systems in our body and environment

  • Advanced cybernetic and bionic senses, organs, and limbs that are superior to our biological ones

  • Poverty reduction tools to create worldwide abundance and then radical abundance

  • Computer brain interfaces allowing for our intelligence to multiply millions of times

  • Manipulate molecules and atoms

  • The ability to live in space


And the following technologies are here today:  Sensors, nanotechnology medicine, quantum computing, bioinformatics, synthetic biology, robotics, nanobots, artificial organs and senses, ubiquitous knowledge, smart materials, open source software, IBM's Watson, Google search, Siri, Google assistant, computer-brain interfaces, telepresence robots, self-aware robots,3D printing, longevity escape velocity biotech, server farms (the cloud), microelectromechanical systems, smart phones, tablets, cybernetic limbs, medical tricorders, personal genome, genetic analysis, genomic engineering, proteomics, exoskeletons, autonomous machines (cars, planes, insects, rats, birds, weapons, etc.), gene therapy, desktop sequencers, regenerative medicine (regenerating, growing, and printing human body organs), computer made synthetic life, interactive surfaces, Google's Project Glass, Google Fiber, augmented reality, cryogenics, repurposed drugs, nanotubes, nano-shells, nanoviricides, and smart, interactive, and energy producing walls, floors, countertops, mirrors, doors, and windows.

What this last graph means is that your eighth-grade student, by the time she graduates from high school will be facing a higher education technological world that is 32 times more advanced than the one she knows today. Exactly how are educators expected to predict and educate students to such a world? And by the time our eighth-grader graduates college and is expected to perform in the real world, she will be in a world of technology that is 500 times more advanced than today's. How does one prepare a student to compete in a global marketplace that has been so dramatically changed by technology?

Saturday, July 25, 2015

If you are a Microsoft Office User. . .

If you are a Microsoft Office user you might find email subscriptions to these sites of value.

Microsoft Excel Tips:


I often wish I could do something a little odd in Excel like deleting old data from a worksheet based on particular date. Here's the tip on how to do it:

This can be rather easily done with a macro. All you need to do is have the macro step through the data and compare the date in each row to today's date. If the date is less than today, then the Delete method is used on the EntireRow object.
Sub DeleteRows1()
Dim x As Long
Dim iCol As Integer

iCol = 7 'Filter all on Col G

For x = Cells(Cells.Rows.Count, iCol).End(xlUp).Row To 2 Step -1
If Cells(x, iCol).Value < Date Then
Cells(x, iCol).EntireRow.Delete
End If
Next
End Sub

In this example, the macro checks column G (in the iCol variable) for the date. If your date is in a different column, then you should make the change to the variable. Depending on the number of rows of data in your worksheet, the macro may also take quite a while to run.

If you notice a lag in performance, then you may want to use a different approach. The following example uses the AutoFilter capabilities of Excel to first filter the data to show only the old data, and then deletes those rows.
Sub DeleteRows2()
Dim Dates As Range
Dim nRows As Double
Dim currDate As Variant

'Format dates as text
Range("Dates").NumberFormat = "@"
'Today's date in number format
currDate = CDbl(Date)
Range("Dates").AutoFilter Field:=1, _
Criteria1:="<" & currDate
nRows = Range("Dates").Rows.Count
Rows("2:" & nRows).Select
Selection.Delete Shift:=xlUp
Range("Dates").AutoFilter
Range("Dates").NumberFormat = "m/d/yyyy"
Range("C2").Select
End Sub

This macro presumes that you have taken the step of assigning a name to your data range. Select all the cells in your data table—including any heading row—and give it the name "Dates." When you run the macro, it uses this range as the target for the AutoFilter.

The above tip is from a free email subscription at exclribbon.tips.net.

Microsoft Word Tips:


Or in Microsoft Word, you might find that when you begin typing a document, the text starts out in Normal style especially when typing short bits of text with no punctuation at the end. Then when you press Enter a couple of times to move to a new line, the style changes to Heading 1 with different font and color (of course). Upon backspacing the text reverts to the default font and style.

Believe it or not, this is a built-in feature of Word. In its never-ending quest to be as helpful as possible, Word tries to anticipate how you want your text formatted. If you type in a paragraph that contains a small number of words (typically five words or less) and you don't put a punctuation mark at the end of those words, then the program—as soon as you press Enter—assumes you are entering a new heading and applies a heading style to what you entered.

Here's how you can turn off that feature of Word:


    1. Display the Word Options dialog box. (In Word 2007 click the Office button and then click Word Options. In Word 2010 and Word 2013 click the File tab of the ribbon and then click Options.)

    2. Make sure that Proofing is selected at the left side of the dialog box.

    3. Click the AutoCorrect Options button. Word displays the AutoCorrect dialog box.

    4. Make sure the AutoFormat As You Type tab is displayed. (See Figure 1.)




Figure 1. The AutoFormat As You Type tab of the AutoCorrect dialog box.




  1. Clear the Built-in Heading Styles check box.

  2. Click on OK.


That tip if from a free email subscription at wordribbon.tip.net.

Friday, July 24, 2015

Federal or Local Control?

On the new 74million.org site, Conor Williams makes a strong argument against federal influence in education:

"I'm not some reflexively pro-centralization, big government cheerleader, OK? Let me be clear. There are plenty ofkludgeocratic, dumb regulations that creep down through federal and state mandates. Top-down accountability can get ugly fast. It works best when setting expectations and imposing (crisp, direct) consequences. Too often, it strays into unwieldy dictates for teachers' or administrators’ daily work. I get that."

And a strong argument against state and district control citing the misdirection of funds by LAUSD:

"At a systemic level, there's precious little evidence that states and districts are ready to seize their achievement gaps and make uncomfortable choices about reallocating educational resources to benefit the underserved. Remove the pressure from above, and they quickly find other priorities—like getting extra dollars to schools serving privileged white families."

His perfect solution is. . . ?

The stated primary goal of centralizers and localizers is equality of education for all students leading to closing the achievement gap. We've tried both with little no positive impact. From my perspective, placing all the responsibility on education is blaming the result for the cause. Neither the Department of Education nor state and district education bureaucracies no matter how well intentioned their efforts can ever make the needed changes to the broader underlying cultural issues that are reflected in rates of poverty, unemployment, welfare dependency, and, yes, educational inequities.

Thursday, July 23, 2015

A Tool for 1:1 Classrooms

"Splashtop Classroom allows teachers to share their desktop and applications. Once connected, students can view, control and annotate over lesson content directly from their mobile device. Splashtop Classroom is perfect for teachers and instructors that want to engage the entire room!"

Watch short video.

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Exactly How Do We Fix It?

The following article by Peter Greene is a reasoned positive response to education reforms. Rather than just slamming reforms as do most of the anti-reformist bloggers he admits to shortcomings and goes some way toward identifying areas needing improvement regarding teacher quality, student equity, and teacher accountability. However, and it is a big HOWEVER, he stops way short of proposing any sort of plan of how to do the "real work we need to do." How do we identify and help underperforming teachers? How do we inspire administrators to do a better job of hiring and growing staff? How do we improve teacher education? How do we transition teaching into a true, professional self-governing body? How can an excellent education be offered to every child? And what does that even mean? Does it mean ensuring all children have the same education advantages as those with the wealthiest parents? How do we ensure complete transparency and actionable accountability? Exactly how do we fix it?

The Curmudgucation writes:

We Can't Go Back


Those of us who argue against reformster policies in education sometimes fall into the mistake of wanting to go back, to roll back the clock to the days before high-stakes test driven accountability, federally-coerced standards, and privateering began messing with public education in earnest.
We can't, and we shouldn't want to. Because there is real work we need to do.


Teacher Quality



The assertion that the education system is overrun with terrible teachers and that if we just root them out, all will be hunky-dory-- that's a dumb assertion. But I am not going to look you in the eye and say there are not teachers who desperately need help or even teachers who just need to get out of the classroom. Those people exist. What often does not exist is any system or mechanism for helping them out and thereby lifting up the schools in which they teach.

Some of the work needs to be done on the administrative level. School leaders can do a better job of hiring and a better job of growing staff.

We also need to look at the supply chain. One of the unfortunate effects of thirteen years of assault on public education is some real damage to the teacher pipeline.

If only teaching were like other professions. Doctors, nurses, lawyers-- they control their own professional pipelines. To become a doctor, you have to go through a doctor-certified program and win the approval of other doctors. To become a teacher you just have satisfy a bunch of bureaucrats who haven't a clue what you do.

Equity

People who hate No Child Left Behind still praise its disaggregation of results. Some folks are right now still arguing that we must test every student every year so that non-white, non-wealthy, special needs students will not be hidden and invisible. Yes, some of those folks are money-grubbing opportunists, but some are absolutely sincere, and they have a point.

We cannot just say, "Oh, just trust us to take care of those kids. We always did right by them in the past." Because we didn't. Not in some places.

Is it really that surprising to say so? Schools reflect their communities. If your community is racist, chances are racism is embedded in your institutions as well. If your community bows to the power of the wealthy, chances are your not-so-wealthy students are getting the short end of the stick.
Reform programs have not addressed equity issues. They have instead disenfrachsed community members and resegregated students. But just because someone has sold you snake oil, that doesn't mean your illness isn't real. We face the challenge of providing excellent education for all students, and we have to do a far better job of meeting that challenge.

Accountability

Real accountability is not stack ranking, and it is not making many schools compete for limited resources. But we owe taxpayers a full accounting for what we do with the tax dollars they hand to us and the trust they place in us.

Schools have not always been great at transparency. We close the doors and tell our community, "Trust us. And leave us alone." In some communities public schools really have behaved like the obnoxious monopolies reformsters accuse us of being.

Parents are entitled to know how their students are doing. taxpayers are entitled to know what they're getting for their hard-earned dollar.

The Irony

There are some schools that have met and conquered these challenges, and the rest of us can learn from them. We need to learn from them.

The irony is that many reformster programs, like the high stakes testing currently under the legislative microscope, have been sold as solutions to all of these problems, when in fact they don't solve any of these problems.

But in pushing back, we have to remember two things. First, don't confuse pointing out the false solutions with dismissing the actual problems, second, don't forget that the problems still need to be addressed.

We cannot go back, and even if we had a fully-tricked out DeLorean, we shouldn't go back. The problem with reformster policies is not that they keep us from staying in a perfect past, but that they keep us from moving forward into a better future. That journey into the future, that pursuit of real solutions and real improvements that actually address our real challenges-- that's what we need to reclaim.

Windows 10 Update Soon

Many of us (Windows 7 and 8 users) have reserved and will receive the Windows 10 update file on or soon after July 29. The update file will download automatically. However, prior to installing it, you may want to:

  1. View the Windows 10 FAQs and Tips website.

  2. Create an image of your computer: "Windows 10 is the biggest and most aggressive Windows rollout to date. Before you take the plunge you need to image your hard drive so, should you wish to return to the familiarity of Windows 7 or Windows 8 you can do so with the click of a button."


Note that the image creation tutorial lists Macrium Reflect Free as one of the items you need. This is a great application for backing up your computer that you should have in your tools whether or not you elect to upgrade to Windows 10.

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

The Server Must Be Down

Blame it on the server. Many glitches are blamed on the server which by extension places blame on the server/network administrator, a technician with a difficult job. This short blog is about server basics and is intended to give network end-users some appreciation for the work servers perform.

What is a server?


computer or device on a network that manages network resources. A server can be a hardware device or a computer application (software).

Types of servers:


File: a computer and storage device dedicated to storing files.
Print: a computer that manages one or more printers, and a network server is a computer that manages network traffic.
Database: a computer system that processes database queries.
Web: a computer that delivers (serves up) Web pages. Every Web server has an IP address and possibly a domain name.
Proxy: a serverintercepts all requests to the real server to see if it can fulfill the requests itself. If not, it forwards the request to the real server.
Application: a program that handles all application operations between users and an organization's backend business applications or databases.
Cloud: a group of multiple connected servers (a cloud) on the Internet performing one or more standard server function.
Backup: a server responsible for backing up and restoring files, folders, databases and hard drives on a network in order to prevent the loss of data in the event of a hard drive failure, user error, disaster or accident.
Fax: provides fax services for clients.
Name: provides DNS services.
Sound: provides multimedia broadcasting, streaming.
Mail: handles transport of and access to email.
Communications: carrier-grade computing platform for communications networks.
Catalog: a central search point for information across a distributed network

Maintaining and managing servers to support a school with as few as 400 computers running a mix of operating systems is full-time job sometimes requiring third-party support. Consequently, many schools have opted to move many server services to the cloud in recent years. The advantages and disadvantages of in-house servers versus cloud services are beyond the scope of this blog. Anyway, the physical location of the server providing end-user services is seldom of concern to end-users.

4 Questions to Ask about Your Lesson, Unit or Activity

From the dangerously!irrelevant blog:

  1. Deeper learning. Did it allow students to go beyond factual recall and procedural regurgitation and be creative, collaborative, critical thinkers and problem-solvers? Did it really? [If not, why not? Our graduates need to be deeper learners and doers so that they can add value beyond what search engines, Siri, and YouTube already can do.]

  2. Student agency. Did it allow students to drive their own learning rather than being heavily teacher-directed? Did it really? [If not, why not? Our graduates need to be autonomous, self-directed, lifelong learners so that they can reskill and adapt in a rapidly changing world.]

  3. Authentic work. Did it allow students to be engaged with and/or make a contribution to the world outside the school walls? Did it really? [If not, why not? Our graduates need to be locally- and globally-active so that they can be positive citizens and contributors to both their community and the larger world.]

  4. Digital tools. Did it allow students to use digital learning tools to enhance their learning beyond traditional analog affordances? Did it really? [If not, why not? Our graduates need to be digitally fluent so that they can effectively navigate our technology-suffused information, economic, and learning landscapes.]


What percentage of the learning occurring in your school system would simultaneously satisfy at least two of the above (2Q)? At least three of the above (3Q) for a triple win? All four (4Q) for the quadruple win?

Saturday, July 18, 2015

Cognitive Science and Learning

Cognitive science can reshape the way we teach.


Highlights:


Lectures = bad
Active learning = good

Praise = bad
Challenges = good

Rereading, highlighting, underlining = bad
Self-quizzes, flashcards, written reflections = good

Big exams, term papers = bad
Short quizzes, frequent writing assignments = good

Blended Learning: Is Rhode Island's Future the Future in Education?

An excellent discussion of blended learning in Rhode Island here.

Highlights:

To be successful, experts agree, a blended learning program needs to have a clearly articulated vision from its educational leadership, the right technological tools and an in-depth professional development program for teachers.

...a growing need for more and better “curation” of the best ed-tech tools, programs and approaches. That way, teachers wouldn’t have to spend hours experimenting and trying to keep up with the exploding marketplace for blended learning, and could focus more on their students.

Blended learning can provide teachers with crucial feedback that enables them to intervene with greater precision and effectiveness and customize learning for their students.

Technology is just a tool for teaching and learning, not an end unto itself. Learning can be messy. Not all learning is linear and students have different needs and ways of communicating what they can do and what they don’t know. There is no technological substitute for the judgment of a good teacher.

Technology also can’t replace an educational vision. What are your goals? Are you trying to close achievement gaps? Are you emphasizing project-based learning? Are you trying to develop entrepreneurs? How are you using technology to help achieve those goals?

Right now, any teacher who is running blended learning well is managing a huge workload. The work is not sustainable for all, and many of our current classroom teachers can’t or won’t put in the hours necessary to run their classroom this way, especially if they don’t see tangible benefits to doing so.

State and district leaders must figure out ways to mobilize and organize collaboratively so that we can source both content and assessments with and for classroom teachers. Ed-tech products can be partners in this work, but ultimately the system must have local buy-in and local ownership if it’s going to stick.

It’s not enough to promote the expansion of blended classrooms; we must also equip teachers with the proper tools to make their systems manageable.

We need our building leaders to be driving blended learning change, which requires that superintendents take time-consuming administrative tasks off their plates so that principals can devote more energy to the shift to blended learning.

We also have to do a better job gathering data on how well these technologies are actually working.

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

From Classroom to Factory Floor Cubicle

Some good stuff here but you don't have to read too far into this document to see how they've defined the role of K-12 education. Download PDF here.

2015-07-15_0659

Monday, July 13, 2015

Problem-Based Learning (PBL)

Problem-Based Learning Explained for Teachers

I consider articles like the above to be insulting--like we didn't know. Like technology, PBL will be used by teachers when appropriate. Those who don't consider its use are just lazy, not unknowing. Personally, I prefer "Project-based Learning" as being more inclusive. The book references, however, are good for in-depth looks into PBL.

Sunday, July 12, 2015

3rd Graders Spend 75% of Day on iPads--Good or Bad?

Glued to the Screen: Inside a 3rd Grade Classroom Where Kids Spend 75% of the Day on iPads






What digital learning looks like when third-graders use it all day in one suburban district.








 INEOLA, N.Y. — When the 24 third-graders in Morgan Mercaldi’s class arrive at the Jackson Avenue School every morning, they take their iPads out of their backpacks and put them on their desks. The tablets will remain there, or in hands and laps, until the children put them in their packs to take them home.



Last year Mercaldi had her students stash the iPads away when they weren’t using them. But she has abandoned that. “Putting them away serves no purpose. We use them constantly,” Mercaldi says.

Mercaldi’s class in Mineola, N.Y., is in the fifth year of a district initiative that now provides iPads to all students in grades three through nine. At Jackson Avenue, which houses the third and fourth grades, all 417 children, including those in special education, have their own tablets, and they spend about 75 percent of their instructional day on the devices, more than many other schools that have embraced digital learning.

Despite a lack of hard data on how digital learning affects student achievement, Mineola, a fairly affluent New York City suburb, is betting heavily on technology to help children meet an array of tough Common Core standards. By embracing iPads while keeping the traditional model of one teacher working with 20-some children, the small school district offers a vision of what the future of digital learning might be.

Here’s a typical day in a third-grade classroom.

10 – 11:20 a.m.

At around 10 a.m. on a late-winter day, Mercaldi’s students sit scattered around the sunny classroom, some at their desks, some perched on a shelf running along one wall and some on the bright blue rug. All the children have their iPads out as they read and do English language arts exercises. Many use eSpark, which creates a “playlist” of education apps geared to each student’s needs.

After about 25 minutes, Mercaldi calls the students together to revise the first-person pieces about frogs that they each researched and wrote. Like so much in the class, the assignment has had digital and paper elements. Mercaldi’s students received their iPads in October, and now move smoothly from pencil to touch screen and from paper to tablet. The children did their frog research both online and in books, organized the materials on their iPads, and did their writing on paper.

Now, Mercaldi tells the students to begin revising their narratives. “I want you to work on communication skills with a partner,” she says. The children leave their iPads on their desks and sit on the floor in two concentric circles. Working in pairs, they alter words in their texts. One suggests changing “scary” to “frightening”; another, “animal” to “creature.”

At 10:45 a.m., after a short snack break, the students take out their iPads for the first of several math lessons that Mercaldi will sprinkle throughout the day. Today, the main topic is finding the area of rectangles and the multiplication needed to do that.

As Mercaldi stands at a large interactive whiteboard, the children follow along on their tablets, trying to figure out the area of a 7-by-13 rectangle. “Do we know 7 times 13 just like that?” she asks the students. Most agree they do not, and so break the number down, eventually coming up with 3 times 7 plus 10 times 7.

Staying with math, the students then use their iPads to answer questions Mercaldi has posted on Edmodo, which helps students and teachers communicate electronically and lets Mercaldi see the children’s answers. (Last year Mercaldi used regular email and was bombarded with messages. She finds Edmodo “more efficient … a little more teacher-student.”) Reviewing the students’ work, Mercaldi says, lets her assess whether every child is meeting the standards and, if not, where he or she needs help.

Now in her second year with the iPads and her seventh year as a teacher, Mercaldi seems unfazed by the technology. “I kind of grew up with technology. It’s the future,” she says.

Most children also seem comfortable with the devices. “I have one at home but I was excited to get it at school because I thought it would be an interesting experience,” Brianna DiVirgilio says.

11:20 a.m. – 12:55 p.m.

When students finish their math questions, they can move on — to reading on eSpark, working on an app or watching a video. Then, at around 11:20, the class divides again, this time into four groups, each designated by a color. The group assignments are geared to the students’ individual levels and what they need to know. One group reads with Mercaldi. The other three do lessons on their iPads: one on eSpark, one answering language arts questions on Edmodo and the third on MobyMax, a provider of electronic curricula.

The students seem to like MobyMax the best because it begins every day’s task with a joke. While the technology may be new, the gags aren’t (“What has four wheels and flies?”). The children also like the badges — usually a nature photograph — that they get when they answer a set of questions correctly.

At Mercaldi’s prompting, three girls explain how they made videos about the imaginary organizations all the students created: Clothes Court, Rockin’ Socks and Shoes and Books for Reading. The videos are accessible by scanning a QR code with a mobile device.

A couple of boys are big fans of a drawing app. Demonstrating how it creates various visual effects, Brendan Ludwig observes, “You can do all the basics. You can make a perfect house, and if you want to make changes, you don’t have to delete it.”

With two dozen third-graders using all these apps and programs, technical glitches are inevitable. One girl discovers that the camera on her device is not activated, something Mercaldi promises to fix.

Working on MobyMax, Angelica Moreira cannot call up the math quiz she wants. Other children try to help her, something the school encourages. “We teach the kids how to troubleshoot,” Jackson Avenue principal Janet Gonzalez says. “Some of the kids are teaching the teacher.”

In the meantime, Angelica selects new backgrounds for her tablet. “I do this a lot while I wait around,” she says. But even after her new wallpaper is in place, the quiz will not load. Eventually someone realizes that MobyMax is preventing Angelica from trying a second quiz too soon after taking the first.

Despite being so-called digital natives, the students vary in how expert they are on the iPads and how much they like them. “Some people know more than other people on the iPad and they get jealous,” says Joshua Parr. Joseph Parrino has had trouble with the iPad’s flat electronic keyboard — “my fingers slip,” he explains — and so has brought a plug-in keyboard from home. And several children say they prefer old-fashioned books to the digital alternative.

By 11:40 it’s time for the second of the day’s math lessons, a drill — Mercaldi calls it a “sprint” — in which the students use paper and pencils to rapidly solve a series of problems, this time involving number patterns. After that, they will break for lunch.

12:55 – 2:30 p.m.

Shortly before 1 p.m., the children return from lunch for another math lesson and open their paper workbooks to exercises on finding the area of a rectangle. At Mercaldi’s urging, the students offer various strategies for the same problem. “Use what works,” she says.

After several students depart for music class, those left behind alternate between iPads and paper to solve problems about rectangles and the properties of multiplication.

The tablet has one advantage with the children. “They’re engaged and they like it; it doesn’t seem like a job,” Mercaldi says. But the device also can be too much of a good thing. “It can’t consume their every day,” she says, adding, “The hardest thing was finding the balance.” In general, she tries to take the students off an app after 20 minutes. With several hours during the school day on the iPads, plus homework time and other afterschool use, it’s not hard to imagine that some Jackson Avenue students may look at their tablets for six hours or more a day.

The day’s math lessons end with a problem set, to be done on the iPads. Most students come to the rug to work on the questions with Mercaldi and the other children. A few, though, go it alone. Mercaldi tells the children to list all possible rectangles with an area of 48 square centimeters and to consider what the various shapes might look like.

“When the numbers are closer, don’t they kind of look like squares?” Brianna proposes.

Once they have completed their work and submitted it to Mercaldi, the children can read on eSpark. One boy, though, finds something more enticing to call up on his screen: “Road Crossing.” Some students quickly call him out — “Isn’t that a game?” one asks. Mercaldi picks up on the buzz and asks the boy what he’s doing. Caught, he answers, “I’m playing a game.”

While some parents may have had qualms about giving young children access to the web, Gonzalez says there have been surprisingly few difficulties. The students clearly know the situation: “If you do stuff that’s bad on it, you can have it taken away,” they say.

The day’s final lesson has the children gathered on or around the rug with their iPads for a science class on climate and seasons. Mineola is in the midst of a severe cold spell, and the students chatter with the teacher about this. As that dies out, Mercaldi takes up a reading that is posted on the whiteboard, and the children follow along on their tablets. The text has lots of information and complicated vocabulary, so Mercaldi offers tips. “I would definitely use highlighter to mark something interesting or something you learned,” she advises.

Once they have completed reading the passage, Mercaldi challenges the children to write down something interesting from the reading and to post on Edmodo a picture of the climate zone where they would like to live. She advises anyone who’s not certain of the assignment to take a picture of the whiteboard.

“Can I send you back to your seats? Can you do this without talking? Then you’ll earn three marbles,” she tells them. Students can cash in the marbles for purchases at a classroom store or for a class prize (the children have chosen unstructured tablet time).

The posting of the pictures is a bit slow, and they overlap one another when Mercaldi tries to put them on the whiteboard. She pledges to return to the project the next day. Now it is 2:40, and the children pack up their iPads. It’s time for a hockey game in the gym, and, for now at least, there is no app for that.



Gail Robinson is a Brooklyn-based writer specializing in education and other public policy issues. She is the former editor in chief of Gotham Gazette.



Monday, July 6, 2015

Teaching is Easy and You Have the Summer Off

Copied from the Education and Mobile Learning web site July 6, 2015 (http://www.educatorstechnology.com/p/blog-page_7.html). And when you're done reviewing these and have made your decision regarding which you will be using this school year. . . .  What, you don't have time?

                      21st Century Teaching Resources

                        Teachers Web Tools

                                Google Tools for Teachers

                                 Educational iPad Apps

                            Content Area Resources

                          Educational Social Networking

                                  Teacher Resources

Thursday, July 2, 2015

Odds and Ends

I recently had the opportunity to sit in on a freshman technology class at a local high school. I tried hard not to gasp and shake my head in wonderment. What I observed was wrong on two levels: 1) a separate course on "computers" was still being taught and 2) the course curriculum was devoted primarily to hardware, software, firmware, networking, the Internet, etc. (what I refer to in the title as "hardcore technology"). All straight out of the 1980's, 90's, and 00's. In fact the computer being used by the teacher to demonstrate the hardware parts was obviously a very old desktop, an object, I would bet, many of the students had never seen in operation. I didn't stay long enough to see how the teacher would explain the 3.5-inch disk drive. Strangely, to top it off, each student in the classroom was taking notes on a newer iPad (required purchase). Who taught them to take notes on a notetaking app? NOBODY! They taught themselves. (I'm pretty sure it was Evernote.) This is, of course, an anomaly isn't it? Surely the vast majority of our schools have moved on to focusing on learning and integrating technology into their curriculum and classrooms as appropriate to enhance learning.

And then there is Scott McLeod's (Dangerously Irrelevant) observation regarding "3 kinds of ISTE sessions": 1) Tools, Tools, Tools; 2) Technology for school replication (perpetuate schools’ historical emphases on factual recall and procedural regurgitation): and finally 3) Technology for school transformation (focus on deeper learning, greater student agency, and perhaps real-world, authentic work). This emphasis on tools and replication is, of course, an anomaly isn't it? Surely the vast majority our vendors have moved on to focusing on learning and integrating technology into their curriculum and classrooms as appropriate to enhance learning.

And then do a Google search for "the future of education." Note that the discussions on the first few pages of hits (I quit after looking through the first few) are more about the future of technology in education than education, learning/learning models, pedagogy, or classroom management (except as a byproduct of ed tech). Of course later pages would begin to focus more on education. Surely the vast majority of blogs and Internet discussions have moved on to focusing on learning and integrating technology into their curriculum and classrooms as appropriate to enhance learning.