Friday, April 5, 2013

Excellent Article on What's Wrong with Education in U.S.

http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/2153/the_vampire_school.aspx#.UV6u0H9wo8E

The article is lengthy but a couple of significant points can be garnered from the following dialogue and the third to last paragraph.

The dialogue:
Someone knocks at your door.  “Hello,” says the fellow, flashing his card.  “My name is John Smith.  I hear you have a twelve-year-old boy here.”
“Yes, my son Bobby.  Has he gotten into any trouble?”
“Oh no, sir, not yet.  I am simply here to talk to him about sex.”
“I see.”
“Yes, I am licensed by the state and the school district,” he says, flashing another card, “to talk to Bobby about sex.  He is here, perhaps?”  The man elbows his way into the living room, glancing at the titles of the books in your bookcase.
“As a matter of fact, he isn’t.  He’s down by the pond fishing with his little brother.”
“A pond, fishing,” says the man, writing on a notepad.  “Unsupervised fishing at a pond.  Very well.  When may I see him?  My appointments are rapidly filling up.”
“Shouldn’t I first know something about you?” you ask, naively.  “Suppose you don’t believe the same things I believe.”
“My dear sir,” says the man, arching an eyebrow, and smiling ever so slightly, “it is not your place to know anything about me.  If there’s any knowing going on, it will be I who must find things out about you.  But really,” he continues, assuming an academic air, “the subject of sex is as scientific and precise as physics or mathematics, so that what you happen to believe about it is of no more import than what you believe about the composition of the moon, or the area of a circle.  It is a part of my work”—here he lowers his voice to something between a purr and a growl—“to disabuse young people of theprejudices their parents bring to sex.  Now then, when will your son be available?”
You hesitate.  More writing on the notepad.
“Will tomorrow at noon be all right?”
“Tomorrow at three, fine.”
You begin to close the door.  “Not so fast,” says Mr. Smith.  “There’s the little matter of the fee.”
“You mean you are going to charge me money for this?”
“My dear sir,” he beams, “recall, I am an expert.  You wouldn’t want to do your own plumbing, would you?  No, of course not.  Or prepare your own meals, except under duress?  Or provide your own entertainment?  Play your own musical instruments?  Invent your own sports?  Get together with your own neighbors to play cards?  Build your own garage?  Farm your own land?  Read your own old and musty books, and think about them by yourself?  Make love to your own wife without the aid of expert tips from magazines and pornographic videos?  Worship God with your fellow believers?”
“What’s wrong with that?” you stammer, but he snaps the notebook shut.  “I haven’t all day.  Here is my bill.  I make $50 an hour.  Sixty hours with Bobby should about do it.  If he fails, my colleague Ms. Jones will be available for remedial lessons.  Good day.”
And you give in.
The third to last paragraph:  'When children are ready to learn a subject, they will learn it. He tells of a group of his school’s nine-year-olds and twelve-year-olds, who suddenly announced that they wanted to learn arithmetic—all of it.  So he dug up a textbook from 1898, full of examples and exercises, and gave it to them.  Addition took two classes, he says, and subtraction another two.  The children memorized the multiplication tables, then tackled the exercises.  “They were high, all of them,” he says, “sailing along, mastering all the techniques and algorithms.”  Then they went on to long division, fractions, decimals, percentages, and square roots.  “In twenty weeks, after twenty contact hours, they had covered it all,” writes Greenberg, “six years’ worth.” '
I believe that applies as well to adults.

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Fighting Federal Tyranny-a Post by Patrick Archbold


States Rights, States Fights

I live in NY, USA. I live under tyranny.

Oh sure, perhaps we haven't seen the worst of it yet, but it is coming. My right to exercise my religion, my right to decide what I wish to purchase and what not to, and my right to protect myself and my family are under constant attack and already greatly diminished.

Say what you want, but it is tyranny. When fundamental rights are diminished or dismissed in hurried secret meetings by secret legislative and executive cabals, you live under tyranny.

For when tyrants no longer fear ballots, they come after your bullets. Tyrants are not stupid. They must remove any lasting threat. Your ability to join with your neighbor to say 'no' and to defend that action with force is the only thing that threatens them.

So if liberty is not to completely die in this country, what must happen?

First let me say, secession is a fool's errand. As attractive as it may seem, it comes with a lot of unnecessary baggage that distracts from the cause.

What needs to happen is for several states to simply say no. No more. The federal government has broken the bonds of legitimate authority and states are no longer obliged to go along. States have rights too.

States need to simply say no. When the feds pass laws that abrogate the rights of its citizens, the states need to simply say no. Not here. Good luck enforcing it. And not just for intrastate commerce, across the board. HHS mandate, sorry not here. Citizens of this state can buy or not buy what they want. We will prosecute any federal employee who tries to enforce the penalty. Try us.

States also need to say no to the spending. They should pass amendments to their constitutions that prohibit sending more the 15% of the state GDP to the Feds and then withhold the money. The Feds will certainly respond by cutting off programs and other measures, but the States must take it on the chin. If enough of them do it at the same time, the Feds will be stuck. They can play that game and win with a few states, but if 10 do it simultaneously? Perhaps not.

They also need to say no to unfunded and funded mandates. They should reject the Federal money and decide for themselves which social programs they want and which they don't.

Do not get me wrong, this would be messy, imperfect, protracted and would likely have myriad unintended consequences. But if liberty is to survive in this country, the states must rebel. But this time don't leave the Union, save it.

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Liberties

From an historical perspective, it appears that unchecked governments, democracies not excluded, will naturally and incrementally restrict individual and group liberties at an increasing rate until they exceed the tolerance of a significant minority willing to exchange immediate injury or death for a free future. In a democracy like that of the United States, with a supposed checks and balance system, the limiting of liberties occurs at a greater rate when there is collusion between the executive and legislative branches as when one party is in control of both branches. The Supreme Court may as well lean toward the ruling branches but even when evenly balanced or comprising unusually fair justices, it is of small consequence. The Court takes on very few cases and then only after an extended period of time. Then there is the powerful shadow branch, that enormous appointment-controlled, rule making and enforcement bureaucracy. America loses. Gun purchases go up.

Saturday, January 12, 2013

Political Disagreements

Obama and the White House (despite how the term is used, I don't believe "White House" is a person) often use the phrase, "we can disagree without being disagreeable." What does that mean? It means that Obama and/or his express their opinions/beliefs in civil terms and those that might disagree likewise express theirs. Disagreements while heard are not considered. Obama, being in power, acts upon his, those who disagree, not being in power, are expected to shut up and go away, never to bring up the subject again and certainly never to act upon their opinions or beliefs. America loses. Americans buy more guns.