Friday, January 17, 2025

Determinism

 It appears obvious to most of us (experientially) that every event is preceded by a causal event, at least going back as far as the beginning of the universe. This is referred to as the deterministic view. To get around the creation event problem, we first created gods, then God, then an infinite inanimate forever universe. All would exist without a cause (Aristotle’s “unmoved mover” or first cause). While the causality (deterministic) theory makes obvious sense, it has problems, initially with free will and now with quantum mechanics. The deterministic view posits that with absolute knowledge regarding current state and the causes of events (including the laws of nature) we should be able to predict future states. Absolute knowledge regarding anything has so far proven to be impossible. However, if we all can agree that every event is caused by prior events, how can free will be a thing? Well, it seems that we can hold two opposing truths simultaneously. Possibly, somehow, we do not hold our decisions and the resultant action events to be 100% caused by prior events. Quantum mechanics also throws doubt on a causality chain view. Particles (waves?) appear to have multiple minds of their own making them unpredictable, unlocatable, and undefinable (wave or particle) thus producing randomness and probability in contradiction to determinism. Can you imagine the upheaval regarding morality and justice if it is determined with absolute certainty that free will does not exist? And, what if we went the other direction and determined that all events are random and unpredictable? 

Monday, January 13, 2025

Something from Nothing

 I recent asked a correspondent the question, "Over 300 years ago Leibniz asked the question, 'Why is there something, rather than nothing?'. Scientists, psychologists, and philosophers have been trying to answer that question since. What is your best guess?

The response I received was, "why not"?.

I wrote back: "Actually, a brilliant response. Your question implies that an eternal power (the first cause), on a ‘why not?’ whim, brought the ‘something’ (a universe) into being. Heraclitus and Aristotle both believed that initial and continued existence was consistent with causality, that all events were the effects of previous causes. Many people still believe that, that first cause, that eternal power was/is an omniscient God. Of course, that doesn’t answer the why question. The scientific answer is that we, and the universe, just are. A more recent theory is that the universe and life and human potentiality always was, that there never was a ‘nothing’. Quantum mechanics demonstrates that ‘nothing’ is an impossibility."


Thursday, January 2, 2025

Climate Change

The following is from Copilot on 1/2/2025 when forced to predict the number of deaths over what periods of time if nothing more is done to slow/top climate change:

The projected death toll from climate change varies depending on the specific impact and the time frame considered. Here are some estimates based on current research:

  1. Extreme Temperatures: By the end of the century, extreme temperatures (both heat and cold) could cause around 10.8 million deaths annually.

  2. Air Pollution: Climate change and air pollution combined could result in approximately 19.5 million deaths annually by 2100.

  3. Natural Disasters: Floods, droughts, heatwaves, tropical storms, wildfires, and rising sea levels are expected to cause significant mortality. For example, floods alone could account for 8.5 million deaths by 2050.

  4. Overall Impact: The World Economic Forum estimates that climate change may cause an additional 14.5 million deaths by 2050.